<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TeKnocratix &#187; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teknocratix.com/category/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teknocratix.com</link>
	<description>The Politics of Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:13:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FTC to Bloggers: Don&#8217;t Worry, We&#8217;re Powerless to Fine You!</title>
		<link>http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/13/ftc-to-bloggers-dont-worry-were-powerless-to-fine-you/</link>
		<comments>http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/13/ftc-to-bloggers-dont-worry-were-powerless-to-fine-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcenters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/13/ftc-to-bloggers-dont-worry-were-powerless-to-fine-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://teknocratix.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/federaltradecommissionftclogo_jpg.png"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="federal-trade-commission-ftc-logo_jpg" border="0" alt="federal-trade-commission-ftc-logo_jpg" align="left" src="http://teknocratix.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/federaltradecommissionftclogo_jpg_thumb.png" width="240" height="240" /></a> Last week, we reported that the Federal Trade Commission <a href="http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/05/bloggers-could-be-fined-11000-under-new-ftc-regulations/" target="_blank">planned to fine bloggers up to $11,000</a> if they didn’t disclose anything that could be counted as an endorsement. Well, fear not, The Washington Post’s Cecilia Kang <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/posttech/2009/10/note_to_federal_trade_commissi.html?wprss=posttech" target="_blank">spoke with the FTC’s Richard Cleland</a> and found that its threats were mostly hot air.</p>
<p>&#34;We do not have authority to impose a fine for violation of the (FTC) Act,&#34; Cleland told Kang.</p>
<p>Cleland explained that enforcement will mostly be through warning letters, and if things get <p>Continue reading <a href="http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/13/ftc-to-bloggers-dont-worry-were-powerless-to-fine-you/">FTC to Bloggers: Don&#8217;t Worry, We&#8217;re Powerless to Fine You!</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://teknocratix.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/federaltradecommissionftclogo_jpg.png"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="federal-trade-commission-ftc-logo_jpg" border="0" alt="federal-trade-commission-ftc-logo_jpg" align="left" src="http://teknocratix.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/federaltradecommissionftclogo_jpg_thumb.png" width="240" height="240" /></a> Last week, we reported that the Federal Trade Commission <a href="http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/05/bloggers-could-be-fined-11000-under-new-ftc-regulations/" target="_blank">planned to fine bloggers up to $11,000</a> if they didn’t disclose anything that could be counted as an endorsement. Well, fear not, The Washington Post’s Cecilia Kang <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/posttech/2009/10/note_to_federal_trade_commissi.html?wprss=posttech" target="_blank">spoke with the FTC’s Richard Cleland</a> and found that its threats were mostly hot air.</p>
<p>&quot;We do not have authority to impose a fine for violation of the (FTC) Act,&quot; Cleland told Kang.</p>
<p>Cleland explained that enforcement will mostly be through warning letters, and if things get bad enough, it could be taken to court. </p>
<p>&quot;I have to tell you that there is no realistic scenario that we get from here to there,&quot; Cleland said.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Electronic Freedom Foundation has predictably <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/10/ftc-regulation" target="_blank">come out against the new, useless rules</a>. In particular, the EFF takes exception to the fact that newspaper reporters are not covered under edict.</p>
<p>Cleland <a href="http://www.edrants.com/interview-with-the-ftcs-richard-cleland/" target="_blank">explained the FTC’s reasoning</a> to blogger Edward Champion, “Most of the newspapers have very strict rules about that and on what happens to those products.”</p>
<p>Yeah, because newspaper reporters never violate their paper’s ethical standards. Neither do video game journalists for that matter. You truly have a dizzying intellect there, Dick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/13/ftc-to-bloggers-dont-worry-were-powerless-to-fine-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Glenn Beck Rape and Murder a Young Girl in 1990?</title>
		<link>http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/08/did-glenn-beck-rape-and-murder-a-young-girl-in-1990/</link>
		<comments>http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/08/did-glenn-beck-rape-and-murder-a-young-girl-in-1990/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcenters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[didglennbeckrapeandmurderayounggirlin1990]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glenn beck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/08/did-glenn-beck-rape-and-murder-a-young-girl-in-1990/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://teknocratix.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/GlennBeck.jpg"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 5px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="Glenn Beck" border="0" alt="Glenn Beck" src="http://teknocratix.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/GlennBeck_thumb.jpg" width="116" height="154" /></a> </p>
<p>No. At least, we have no evidence to support that. However, Glenn Beck <strong>IS</strong> trying to kill the parody website <a href="http://glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com/" target="_blank">DidGlennBeckRapeAndMurderAYoungGirlIn1990.com</a>.</p>
<p>The domain was <a href="http://www.whois.net/whois/glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com" target="_blank">registered by Isaac Eiland-Hall of Panama, Fla. on Sept. 1</a> of this year. The site offers dubious “evidence” that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a young girl in 1990.</p>
<p>A mere three days later, on Sept. 4, Beck filed a <a href="http://randazza.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/glenn-becks-wipo-complaint1.pdf" target="_blank">complaint with the Word Intellectual Property Organization</a> (PDF), requesting that the domain name be taken from Eiland-Hall.</p>
<p>Eiland-Hall’s <p>Continue reading <a href="http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/08/did-glenn-beck-rape-and-murder-a-young-girl-in-1990/">Did Glenn Beck Rape and Murder a Young Girl in 1990?</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://teknocratix.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/GlennBeck.jpg"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 5px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="Glenn Beck" border="0" alt="Glenn Beck" src="http://teknocratix.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/GlennBeck_thumb.jpg" width="116" height="154" /></a> </p>
<p>No. At least, we have no evidence to support that. However, Glenn Beck <strong>IS</strong> trying to kill the parody website <a href="http://glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com/" target="_blank">DidGlennBeckRapeAndMurderAYoungGirlIn1990.com</a>.</p>
<p>The domain was <a href="http://www.whois.net/whois/glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com" target="_blank">registered by Isaac Eiland-Hall of Panama, Fla. on Sept. 1</a> of this year. The site offers dubious “evidence” that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a young girl in 1990.</p>
<p>A mere three days later, on Sept. 4, Beck filed a <a href="http://randazza.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/glenn-becks-wipo-complaint1.pdf" target="_blank">complaint with the Word Intellectual Property Organization</a> (PDF), requesting that the domain name be taken from Eiland-Hall.</p>
<p>Eiland-Hall’s lawyer, Marc J. Randazza, responded with a <a href="http://gb1990.net/legal/response/D2009-1182%20Response%20Brief.pdf" target="_blank">gloriously sarcastic legal brief</a> (PDF). No seriously, read it, it’s likely the most entertaining legal document you will ever lay eyes upon. Here’s an excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>Beck has tried to paint himself as a “babe in the woods” who has fallen      <br />victim to a vicious character attack.&#160; In reality, Beck is an accomplished       <br />and deliberate manipulator of public opinion, and it is absurd to suggest       <br />that&#160;&#160; he&#160;&#160; himself&#160;&#160; does&#160;&#160; not&#160;&#160; understand&#160;&#160; the&#160;&#160; nature&#160;&#160; and&#160;&#160; function&#160;&#160; of       <br />Respondent’s&#160; website.&#160; Given&#160; his&#160; long&#160; history&#160; of&#160; using&#160; the&#160; Gottfried       <br />Technique,&#160; Beck&#160; must&#160; have&#160; recognized&#160; that&#160; the&#160; respondent&#160; has&#160; merely       <br />presented Mr. Beck with a mirror.&#160; If Beck does not like what he sees, the       <br />Respondent is not to blame.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The joke, borrowed from <a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=179741&amp;title=gilbert-gottfried-pt.-1" target="_blank">Gilbert Gottfried’s hillarious roasting of Bob Saget</a>, originated from a <a href="http://glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com/" target="_blank">post on Fark.com</a>, thus the aforementioned “Gottfried Effect.” The joke became an instant meme, most notably on social news site <a href="http://www.reddit.com/" target="_blank">reddit.com</a>.</p>
<p>Beck himself is no stranger to making outrageous claims, such as <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/28/fox-host-glenn-beck-obama_n_246310.html" target="_blank">calling President Obama a racist</a>. He has even <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/23/video-glenn-beck-responds-to-bill-maher-compares-himself-to-howard-beale/" target="_blank">compared himself to Howard Beale</a>, the crazed newsman in 1976’s classic satire, “<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0074958/" target="_blank">Network</a>.”</p>
<p>There are a couple of curious things about this case. The first is why Beck is attacking the site internationally, instead of inside the United States. Scientific journalist Ed Brayton <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2009/10/beck_tries_to_kill_parody_webs.php" target="_blank">offers a likely explanation</a>.</p>
<p>“Because he knows he would lose a libel suit,” said Brayton in an Oct. 5 post. “He is a public figure and the site is clearly satirical. Under precedents like Falwell v Flynt, it is virtually impossible to win such a suit.”</p>
<p>The second is Beck’s silence on the vicious rumor that he raped and murdered a young girl in 1990. Odd behavior for such an outspoken man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/08/did-glenn-beck-rape-and-murder-a-young-girl-in-1990/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
