<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TeKnocratix &#187; eff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teknocratix.com/tag/eff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teknocratix.com</link>
	<description>The Politics of Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:13:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FTC to Bloggers: Don&#8217;t Worry, We&#8217;re Powerless to Fine You!</title>
		<link>http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/13/ftc-to-bloggers-dont-worry-were-powerless-to-fine-you/</link>
		<comments>http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/13/ftc-to-bloggers-dont-worry-were-powerless-to-fine-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcenters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/13/ftc-to-bloggers-dont-worry-were-powerless-to-fine-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://teknocratix.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/federaltradecommissionftclogo_jpg.png"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="federal-trade-commission-ftc-logo_jpg" border="0" alt="federal-trade-commission-ftc-logo_jpg" align="left" src="http://teknocratix.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/federaltradecommissionftclogo_jpg_thumb.png" width="240" height="240" /></a> Last week, we reported that the Federal Trade Commission <a href="http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/05/bloggers-could-be-fined-11000-under-new-ftc-regulations/" target="_blank">planned to fine bloggers up to $11,000</a> if they didn’t disclose anything that could be counted as an endorsement. Well, fear not, The Washington Post’s Cecilia Kang <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/posttech/2009/10/note_to_federal_trade_commissi.html?wprss=posttech" target="_blank">spoke with the FTC’s Richard Cleland</a> and found that its threats were mostly hot air.</p>
<p>&#34;We do not have authority to impose a fine for violation of the (FTC) Act,&#34; Cleland told Kang.</p>
<p>Cleland explained that enforcement will mostly be through warning letters, and if things get <p>Continue reading <a href="http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/13/ftc-to-bloggers-dont-worry-were-powerless-to-fine-you/">FTC to Bloggers: Don&#8217;t Worry, We&#8217;re Powerless to Fine You!</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://teknocratix.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/federaltradecommissionftclogo_jpg.png"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="federal-trade-commission-ftc-logo_jpg" border="0" alt="federal-trade-commission-ftc-logo_jpg" align="left" src="http://teknocratix.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/federaltradecommissionftclogo_jpg_thumb.png" width="240" height="240" /></a> Last week, we reported that the Federal Trade Commission <a href="http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/05/bloggers-could-be-fined-11000-under-new-ftc-regulations/" target="_blank">planned to fine bloggers up to $11,000</a> if they didn’t disclose anything that could be counted as an endorsement. Well, fear not, The Washington Post’s Cecilia Kang <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/posttech/2009/10/note_to_federal_trade_commissi.html?wprss=posttech" target="_blank">spoke with the FTC’s Richard Cleland</a> and found that its threats were mostly hot air.</p>
<p>&quot;We do not have authority to impose a fine for violation of the (FTC) Act,&quot; Cleland told Kang.</p>
<p>Cleland explained that enforcement will mostly be through warning letters, and if things get bad enough, it could be taken to court. </p>
<p>&quot;I have to tell you that there is no realistic scenario that we get from here to there,&quot; Cleland said.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Electronic Freedom Foundation has predictably <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/10/ftc-regulation" target="_blank">come out against the new, useless rules</a>. In particular, the EFF takes exception to the fact that newspaper reporters are not covered under edict.</p>
<p>Cleland <a href="http://www.edrants.com/interview-with-the-ftcs-richard-cleland/" target="_blank">explained the FTC’s reasoning</a> to blogger Edward Champion, “Most of the newspapers have very strict rules about that and on what happens to those products.”</p>
<p>Yeah, because newspaper reporters never violate their paper’s ethical standards. Neither do video game journalists for that matter. You truly have a dizzying intellect there, Dick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teknocratix.com/2009/10/13/ftc-to-bloggers-dont-worry-were-powerless-to-fine-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
